![]() It was concluded that the new Lithuanian hazard test shows potential for future research.īackground: Studies show that weakness in hazard perception is a major cause of traffic accidents, leading to high consequences. The results revealed a negative correlation between hazard prediction scores on LHP12 and crash involvement in the novice driver group, as well as a positive correlation between prediction scores and self-reported hazard prediction skills. Drivers with less driving experience demonstrated poorer hazard prediction skills than experienced drivers. ![]() This new version of the test (12 clips, LHP12) showed acceptable psychometric properties. (2011) were used to validate the new test. The Lithuanian Hazard Perception test HPT-LIT featuring static images (Tūskė et al., 2019) and Hazard Perception Questionnaire developed by White et al. On further inspection the overall group difference was driven by 12 clips. The overall score of the test was higher for experienced drivers when compared with novices. Initially, 25 naturalistic clips were included and edited into a hazard prediction test following the “what happens next?” paradigm. Eighty-eight drivers participated in the study. The purpose of the current research is to develop and validate a new video-based hazard prediction test for the Lithuanian driving context. ![]() To this end, a small number of countries have developed a national hazard perception test for their licensing procedures. Scholars suggest that improving hazard perception (HP) skills among different road users can lead to safer driving. ![]() These data support the proposal that the hazard perception test is a valid measure of crash-related driving performance.Ĭopyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. Failing drivers were also 17% (95% CI 6%, 29%) more likely to have been involved in active crashes prior to the test, in the period since obtaining their provisional license. We present data demonstrating that drivers who failed the hazard perception test (based on a ROC curve-derived pass mark) were 25% more likely to be involved in an active crash (defined as a crash occurring while the driver's vehicle was moving but they were not engaged in parking or reversing) during a one year period following the test (controlling for driving exposure, age, and sex). A key validity check for such a test is whether scores are associated with crash involvement. In 2008, the state of Queensland in Australia introduced a video-based hazard perception test as part of the licensing process for new drivers. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |