The justification is detailed as to why the carbon footprint and the embodied energy are used as the impact indicators. The synthesis of the LCA literature reveals that differences in goal and scope, system boundaries, inventory data, and impact assessment methods can induce significant variations in the environmental impact results. This paper explores the environmental impact of concrete, with the evaluation based on the life cycle assessment (LCA) technique, the principles of which are outlined with illustrations relevant to the production of concrete. Evaluating sustainability aspects of concrete could help the industry identify processes with higher impacts, and work on them to perform in a holistic manner. The production and use of concrete are responsible for natural resource consumption and adverse environmental effects. The proposals with the best applicability were specified using these two indications, resulting in the changing of lights, the use of a timer for the compressor, and the reduction of pump usage time, and lastly, the energy performance indicator and the energy use intensity of the building were calculated. Finally, proposals for energy efficiency were developed and examined using the internal rate of return and net present value. It is the part of the company with the most machinery and the most operational hours. The workshop was identified as a problem area when the data were analyzed by agency action areas. Data on power consumption, operating hours, and consumption were recorded for each inventory item. Thus, this paper studies the energy efficiency potentials within a vehicle store in Quito, Ecuador. However, the complexity of most industrial sectors makes it difficult for modelers, businesses, and policymakers to appreciate and realize the full potential for efficiency-driven energy savings in specific industries. Several energy efficiency proposals have been developed by researchers. Industries in different sectors are addressing the emission reductions of their processes. The Maximum Moment at critical load combination is more in RCC preheater tower (i.e 205.6 kN.m) than Steel preheater tower (i.e 190.1 kN.m).The Maximum shear at critical load combination is more in Steel preheater tower 62.0 kN is more than RCC preheater tower 28.7 kN. It is observed that Maximum displacements at a height of 110 mts in RCC preheater tower are 130.59 mm and Steel preheater tower is 102.238 mm. Here the height of the RCC and steel Preheater tower taking as 110 meters. And also the pros & cons will be discussed between the RCC & Steel structure Preheater tower. In this design process, the loads which are affecting the structure will be taken and designed. In this project, a comparative analysis & design will be done between both the RCC structure & Steel structure Preheater tower as per Indian design standards by using Staad Pro software. In Cement plants ‘Preheater tower’ is used, these preheater tower consists of several cyclones, these raw materials are fed at the top of the preheater tower through cyclones it travels to the bottom of the preheater tower, each cyclone in the preheater serves as a heat exchanger and a separate. Cement is the most important material in concrete, In India, at present, there are 120 major cement plants and nearly 300 mini cement plants are manufacturing the cement. As per the 2018 year statistics, India is the second largest producer of cement in the world with 460 million tonnes per year which is over 8% of the global installed capacity. As we know that concrete is a composite material with cement, coarse & fine aggregates bonding together with water that gives hardness with time. A liquid material after water concrete is the most consuming material in the world, concrete is the most important construction material used extensively to construct buildings, dams, roads, etc.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |